Laura ... shut the %$# up!

When I agree with Bill O'Reilly, there is an authentic dilemma. Laura Ingraham, has an egregious perspective of Barack OBama winning the Nobel Peace Prize. An economic state, is not the mistake of one man, neither former President, George Bush or current President, Obama, are responsible for America's economic state. And if the economic state is a basis for power then we are most likely still powerful in that respect and it has nothing to do with peace among other countries. I believe we are still amongst the most powerful nations.

Furthermore, she then said America used to be more militant and powerful ... I mean compared to Korea I do not think we will ever be as powerful as their military until years down the line. She sounds like she is supporting another World War. I do not understand how she can sit there and propagate war, when American families are still waiting for troops to come home from foreign countries. I also want to know what she meant by "people like him.." and "he would a good European representative." You know what Laura, you should be honored our President is acknowledged as a symbol of peace, rather than a symbol of war (ie Bush). America, from my perspective, has really been a country which always has conflicts, whether it is a taking over land, enslaving people, inducing civil war or participating in major wars. Maybe it is time for us to be looked to as a people of resolution and not conflict.